Skip to main content

Sabarimala: Judicial OverActivism of Supreme Court


Sabarimala Issue: Administrative or Religious


Quick thoughts around the Sabarimala issue. I am not sure if Supreme court can actually give a ruling on Sabarimala temple.



Understanding the issue in Sabarimala vs. Supreme Court:


Women between the ages of 10 and 50 cannot enter the temple because Lord Aiyyappan vowed celibacy and didn’t want to be distracted by other women. Hence Sabarimala temple remains closed for women of these ages

Unnecessary Judicial Activism:


Firstly, Courts are supposed to interpret laws and not make them.Their job is to provide correct interpretation and nothing more.


Secondly, Whenever passing a judgement, there has to be an overarching principle which can be applied universally to all situations. For e.g. universal voting rights which means that everyone should be allowed to vote and if women are not allowed to vote then the court can pass judgement again this practice on the overarching principle of equality


Thirdly, the issue should be negatively impacting the well being of the individuals alienation in policy making (voting rights denied), denial of healthcare, denial of spiritual well being.

In this case it is clearly a case of judicial over-activism.


It is denying the wishes of an individual and passing judgments with no overarching principle or a law.


Hypothetical Scenario For Sabarimala:


If I create a club today and it becomes a really fabulous club but I don’t want men to enter, then it is my right as an individual to do so. Court cannot infringe upon my right to privacy and my personal property unless I am doing something illegal.

Secondly, the question of it being a government property vs a private property doesn’t arise. All other religions except Hinduism in India can have private places of worship. (a private church or mosque can be there but not a temple). So temples are forced to share ownership with the state.


Lastly, whether state owned or privately owned, right to privacy exists for everyone. I cannot demand entrance to a woman’s prison or a maternity ward citing discrimination as there is nothing that is being done is illegal.

Overall, the principles of equality and gender justice don’t apply here to Sabarimala like they do in triple talaq.

Non Issue Created In an Issue in Sabarimala

It is neither a religious issue nor an ethical issue. It is simply a case of Supreme court infringing the rights of individual deities in Sabarimala. they have created issue where there never was one.



Labels:

Comments

  1. RaghuJuly 4, 2020 at 6:06 PM

    Nicely written. Btw look into who started it & who is funding the whole thing? The intent & real motive behind such things are very imp.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Depp trial is the best thing to happen to #MeToo Movement

  Best impetus to #MeToo movement Look at NCBI data. ( link ) 52% men faced gender based violence Look at UK data. ( link ). More than 40% of the victims are male.  The Johnny Depp case is a landmark case in more ways than one. It will help the  #MeToo movement become what it originally was: A forum, a rallying cry for the victims of domestic abuse and way to speak up without being afraid of being shamed, ostracized or hunted. Origins of the movement. The #MeToo movement had started with a noble and just cause of giving voice to the women who were abused, survivors of violence and went through traumatic experiences.  It tried to give the benefit of doubt to the women wherever possible, be empathetic and also protect them from subsequent abuse by their perpetrators. However, soon it had started morphing into a medieval witch hunt in which all women are to be believed irrespective of evidence since no woman would ever do such a thing. Right ? #BelieveAllWomen #Metoo is...
Post a Comment
Read more

Dhurandhar: Why are left fundamentalists angry with the expression of creative freedom and freedom of speech ?

Conclusion: Since this is a long article, I will put the conclusion first. Feel free to read the reasoning after  the conclusion. Dhurandhar forces you to think rationally and is slickly made. And this was something that left fundamentalists  always felt was their domain: Thinking and well made propaganda films which pandered to western media and aligned with their colonial mindset.  Dhurandhar breaks all traditional Bollywood tropes, is rough, is slick and confronts some tough truths.  It doesn’t preach, it doesn’t seek validation, it doesn’t apologize. It is rooted, it is grounded and it is brilliant and most importantly it shows the other side of the coin. And this is what is triggering everyone ( and probably that the second Dhurandhar film will also be 1000 crore film) Dhurandhar: Indian cinema’s Oppenheimer Moment There are times when a movie stops being a story, a drama or just another creative expression. It gets elevated to cinema. A cult is created and this...
Post a Comment
Read more

Galwan is India's Israel moment

Israel: surrounded but defiant On June 5, 1967, Israel was surrounded by enemies on all sides. Syria, Egypt and Jordan had launched a full scale war on Israel. Israel was all alone with no world aid forthcoming. The very future of this tiny but proud nation hung in balance. It was all alone and it was a real possibility that the entire nation of Israel might be decimated.   We all know what happened. Israel emerged victorious against all odds.   Galwan: India and China Galwan valley escalation doesn’t seem to be ending anytime soon. Claims and counter claims are flying with little way of verifying either India’s or China’s claims.   While it is easy to dismiss Galwan as a one off transgression by China, it has been many years in the making. Nibbling away at Indian territory through dubious means, India has already (probably) lost a lot of territory to China through a variety of reasons.   India, China, Pakistan and Nepal It is easy today to get carried away due to th...
46 comments
Read more